Monday, 9 December 2013

Devouring Films: What Maisie Knew

Oh hey guys, remember when I read What Maisie Knew this summer because I was like 'there's a film! Skarsgard is in it!' and then I didn't see the film because it wasn't released anywhere and now it's December?
Well, that happened, but it's all ok because (US) Netflix came through for me like it so often does, and has it on there now (i.e. you can watch it toooo! If, you know, I can convince you to do so) so I watched it one quiet Sunday evening when I probably should have been sleeping. But, whatever, sleep can wait.

So, if you're an avid reader of this here blog (I know you ALL are, so well done for having fabulous taste) you'll remember that, after reading What Maisie Knew, I decided it would work really really well updated to modern times, and guess what? I was right! Shocking, I know. So, moved from 19th Century London to 21st Century New York, stripped of all that unnecessary language James uses, and involving certain Swedish Gods, What Maisie Knew really comes into its own.
But don't get me wrong- What Maisie Knew is still all about what Maisie knows. Onata Aprile who plays Maisie is in every single scene of the movie, and if she doesn't see it, then we don't see it either. As in the book, this can sometimes be frustrating because WHAT EXACTLY HAPPENED BETWEEN MAISIE'S TERRIBLE MOTHER AND LINCOLN?! but that's kind of the point of the story- when you're a child, things that adults do are confusing, and sometimes a mystery, and you don't always get the full story of what went on because no one ever thinks to explain it to you.

DAMN, it's hard being a kid.

Anyway. So Onata Aprile is amaaaaazing. I was pretty sure she was going to be, because everything I've read about the film has said 'Onata Aprile is amazing', and that many people can't be wrong (usually). But really- I don't know if she even knew what she was doing, or if she's just blessed with an incredibly expressive face, but damn that kid can emote. She makes it so easy to feel for her because every single thing she's feeling is written all over her face, and it's pretty wonderful to watch.
AND (I thought I was done with the kid, but apparently not) she's never annoying in the way that some children are kind of annoying. She's never too whiny, or wimpy, or tantrumy, or anything like that, but instead she just tries to deal with all the new and different things that are thrown at her as a result of her parents' divorce in the calmest and almost dignified way possible. It feels weird to call a six year old dignified, but that's kind of how she is- she's a child who's used to being alone, waiting for her parents' attention rather than demanding it, and that in itself is kind of heartbreaking to watch.

Let's see, there were other people in the film, I guess... Well, Julianne Moore was awesome because she's Julianne Moore, and she made me dislike her character the perfect amount, so that I could still feel sorry for her when she wanted Maisie's attention, even though that wasn't really something she deserved. Steve Coogan annoys me in general, but he wasn't in the film that much and definitely wasn't supposed to be likable, so that's fine. Joanna Vanderham was also really likeable as Maisie's nanny-turned-stepmother, and it was difficult not to feel for her as the woman duped into marrying this guy who isn't nearly good enough for her, so, I don't know, he didn't have to pay her to look after his child?

I feel like I'm missing someone out, who can that be?
Oh, Skarsgard. I don't think I've seen him in anything before where he's being all adorable and responsible and child rearing, and I have to say, I LIKE it. I would say that it made my ovaries ache but that expression is BULLSHIT and eurgh.  But, let's just say I would totally have his babies (obviously...) but now I can totally imagine that we raise them together and it's beautiful. AHEM. So basically, he's really sweet and lovely, his onscreen (and, actually, offscreen) chemistry with Onata is so lovely to watch, and the uniform he wears to be a bartender is so incredibly hot that I can barely look at him while that's happening. Ahem.

The point! You should probably watch this. If nothing else, it's beautiful to look at, but also? Everything else. All of the other parts. They're good. It stays close enough to James's novel that you can't accuse it of taking liberties, but goes far enough away from it to stand on its own and, actually, be better than the book (in my extremely unbiased opinion). As always, what Maisie knows isn't enough to stop her from getting hurt, but what I know is that this film is pretty great and I know I'll be watching it again.

12 comments:

  1. I think this sounds just marvelous. LIke you, I would have also thought that in the hands of the right director that James' work could transcend the centuries and feel timeless. Damn his wordiness and his judgy-pants, because you KNOW he wears them. But I like Henry James's stories and his heroines, so I'm glad that this worked out well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really kind of hate the way James writes, but at the same time kind of like the stories he chose to tell and they were waaaaay ahead of their time. So yeah, I think this was managed really well, it was already a subject that was ahead of its time and it was so beautiful and sad and sweet and I loved it.

      Delete
  2. I have NO desire to read the book, but a LOT of desire to watch the film, because it sounds brilliant and also I very much like what Skarsgard's hair is doing in these GIFs. Also, I love it when there are amazing child actors in films that make you feel ALL THE FEELS without you getting that 'this child is probably a diva IRL' feeling (or the 'this child isn't even real it's made of cardboard' feeling, which is even worse).

    SHOULD WE START A BLONDE SEX GOD APPRECIATION SOCIETY LAURA? I think we have our first two candidates! :P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. DON'T READ THE BOOK. Unless, I don't know, you're really bored or something and there are no other books around. But when would that happen?!

      Also, YES SKARSGARD HAIR. He is too adorable in this, but even he was overshadowed by Maisie and her sweetness (I know, I was surprised too!) But yeah, she's great.

      BLONDE SEX GOD APPRECIATION SOCIETY STARTS HERE.

      Delete
  3. "but damn that kid can emote. " so it's probably cos I didn't get enough sleep last night, but I laughed for like 3 straight min at this. Prob cos I pictured some kid with an expressive face they can't control and they have no idea why everyone is so moved by them when they're thinking about glitter or something dumb.

    yeah, def the "not enough sleep thing". Also I just finished reading The Shining and "dignified 6 year old" is how I'd describe Danny. So now I assume this kid's story is about haunted hotels. I'd like this recorded like 2 years down the road when I decide to read this I'll know why I thought it was about a haunted house.

    Sorry for the rambling. I'm glad you finally saw your guy's movie!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Book-Danny is the most awesome frickin' kid ever. MOVIE-Danny completely ruined this for me in three ways: 1) He talks to his own finger like some kind of puppetless orphan. 2) He croaks 'REDRUMREDRUMREDRUM' so painfully that you just KNOW that as soon as the camera stopped rolling he had to go eat a bowl of ice cream. 3) The kid seemed like a bit of a stage brat in the behind the scenes documentary thing.

      DIGNIFIED SIX YEAR OLDS FOR THE WIN!

      Delete
    2. Agree with you TOTALLY on book Danny's superiority to movie Danny. Even though I like the movie, the book wins hands down. They're only sort of the same story. Same premise, dif meanings.

      Delete
    3. Ok, I think you guys have adequately covered this in the time it took me to respond. But YEAH, that kid is pretty annoying (although still a better actor than Shelley Duvall) and Maisie is so so so much better. For reals.

      Delete
    4. "He talks to his own finger like some kind of puppetless orphan" - this just won the award for FUNNIEST THING ON THE INTERNET this week. Because damn. Funny because it's funny, and because it's TRUE.

      Delete
  4. I like your ideas, Laura. I think the most devastating fact about this movie is how Maisie's story is probably the same one so many other kids out there have in this world. Heck, sometimes, it's a lot worse than just being passed around from adult-to-adult. Sometimes, they don't even get passed around at all and are just left to fend for themselves. Poor Maisie, but most of all, those poor, real-life kids.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Definitely. I mean, even in this movie, there's the way in which she's passed around, like some kind of pawn but ALSO there are times when nobody thinks it's their turn to have her and that's a much worse feeling.

      Delete
  5. James. Meh. Really it's more - endearing child narrators. Meh.

    BUT OH MY GOD THE DIMPLES. THE HAIR. It's like he absorbs the light of the sun, and then reflects it at you until you're blinded by everything but HOW BEAUTIFUL he is.

    What was that about a sex god appreciation society?

    ReplyDelete