Thursday, 10 October 2013

Devouring Books: The Stepford Wives by Ira Levin

"That's what they all were, the Stepford wives: actresses in commercials, pleased with detergents and floor wax, with cleansers, shampoos and deodorants. Pretty actresses, big in the bosom but small in the talent, playing housewives unconvincingly, too nicey-nice to be real."

The Stepford Wives is surely one of those things that's broken out so far beyond the pages of its original form that no one bothers to read the book anymore. A Stepford wife is a term you'd use to describe someone who's REALLY into housework and whatnot (a loser, in other words) and is, not to put too fine a point on it, sort of acting like a robot. HOW WEIRD.
So, we all know how the story ends, right? (If you didn't, I guess you do now! Sorry...) And the thing is, when you know how a story ends, it's kind of difficult to work up the energy to actually read it because, you know, what's the point? Thankfully, The Stepford Wives is reaaaaally short, and I paid hardly any money for it (3 Ira Levin books for £5, thanks The Book People!) AND I was falling behind on RIP reads, so reading this in one day it was!

So, The Stepford Wives. I think we all know the story, but quick summary- family moves to a new town (Stepford, natch) where the men have their little 'Men's Club' where they hang out and smoke and talk about manly things (no, I don't know either) and the women stay at home and clean and cook and do 'womanly things'. Not just some of the time, but ALL of the time. As in, there is nothing else. Ever. Joanna is the matriarch of this new family in Stepford, and this shit FREAKS HER OUT. She makes a couple of new female friends, who are also new in town (how weird that they're not freaky lady robots...) and when they start acting strange (kind of like... robots) she REALLY freaks out and then things culminate in that ending we all know about.

While I was reading it, I couldn't help but think about what it would have been like reading this in 1972, knowing nothing about it and being SO SHOCKED by the ending. I don't think I'm wrong in thinking that it would have been AWESOME, but there is something to be said for knowing what's going on the whole time. I'm not sure it's a book I'd be that bothered about re-reading (mainly because this sort of was like a re-read, in itself) but I took in and was impressed by little gems like this:
"'I'm doing Marge McCormick's wash. She's got a bug of some kind and can barely move today.'"
Bug... Can barely move... Think about how easily that would just fly over your head if you didn't know the real score, and now appreciate how clever that is. I love it.

Mainly, I didn't mind knowing the end because it meant I could think about important matters of feminism and whatnot.
My thing is this. I can't exactly tell if Ira Levin is like 'ladies, you'd better expect some kind of backlash from all this free-thinking and empowerment you've been doing' or if he's like 'fucking hell, these men are terrible. What the fuck?' Obviously I want it to be the latter, but I'm concerned that it's the former... I guess that, having the story told from Joanna's point of view is almost the same thing as being on her side, except really it's to maintain suspense because she's just the dumb woman who doesn't know anything. So, there's that. The difficult thing of trying to interpret this at all is that you literally know nothing about the men- it's a teeny book anyway, so there isn't tons of character development anyway, but the men are mysterious as hell- they go to their men's club, do their men things, plot turning their wives into robots...

And really, for once, I really want to know what motivates the men. (I know!) Are they really so threatened by their wives having interests outside the home and possibly even having *gasp* jobs of their own that they'd want to replace them with subservient, boring wives with bigger boobs and a 1950s sensibility? Do they hate doing the tiny bit of housework and child-rearing that they're asked to do (and from Joanna's point of view, it really isn't that much) that they'd trade in their human women for something much more sinister? Clearly, the answer is yes, but I still want to know why. The Stepford Wives lets you make up your own mind about that.

 So. This is a really good suspense tale, but there's really not too much to the book- what it really has going for it, though, is the way it makes you think about things for a lot longer than can possibly be healthy. It raises a lot of questions, and then leaves you to answer them for yourself, which can be frustrating, but is ultimately something I really appreciate from books. If you don't mind answering some questions for yourself too, then I wholeheartedly recommend this.

9 comments:

  1. I like your review, although I don't know that I'll be picking up this book. Maaaaaybe if I didn't already know the ending. Of course you mentioned it once or twice above so I'd know it now. I guess I wish you had found there was a lot more to the book than just that ending.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, there's... Yeah, the ending is kind of the thing. But it is sort of fun to read from an informed place because you're like 'ooooh, I see where this is going!' and it's fun. I liked it, anyway, but yeah, it's not THAT important to read, I'd say.

      EVERYONE KNOWS THE ENDING, ALLEY, THAT'S WHY IT'S NOT A SPOILER.

      Delete
  2. I both like the Nicole Kidman version of this movie and am ashamed I like the Nicole Kidman version of this movie. But then I also own the Bewitched movie on DVD, so whatevs,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ohhhhh, so you like bad movies that involve Nicole Kidman! Cool. I kid, because I have seen neither of those things and I'll bet they're not bad. I actually haven't seen a Stepford Wives anything (there are a few movies, right?) so... I should probably get on that.

      Delete
  3. All of a sudden this book seems to have showed up everywhere - when I wanted to read it a couple of years back, I couldn't find it anywhere, but I finally found it in the library recently. And I've seen it in The Works for £1.99/ 3 for £5. I went into the story with a rough idea of what it was about, but enjoyed figuring out the details. Good storytelling, even if, as you mentioned, it doesn't go as deep as one might like. I enjoyed it a lot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh man, I HATE it when you really want to read something and can't find it (cheaply...) and then AGES later when you don't really care anymore you find it- or actually, worse than that is when you pay basically full price for it and then find it in a charity shop days later (has totally happened).

      But anyway! Yeah, I enjoyed this plenty, even if it wasn't so good with the detail and all. Plus it's so teeeeeny and I read it in a day so it's all good!

      Delete
  4. I love the Nicole Kidman version of this movie without shame, but mostly because Matthew Broderick. Having read your review, I don't think I could handle reading it through - I just don't play nice with books I've already seen the movie of, unless I've got a good guarantee things are going to be wildly different/expanded. Wunderbar on the review, lady. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suspect that yeah, this would be a disappointment for you (not that I've seen the movie!) because it's pretty simplistic in style and details and whatnot- good, but simplistic. I know what you mean though- I read The Graduate after I saw the movie, and I REALLY wanted more insight into Benjamin's crazy brain, but basically just got the movie only with possibly LESS detail. It was pretty lame.

      Delete
  5. Dude, you totally reviewed it before I could review it and you SAID ALL THE THINGS ALREADY. I shall link to your review in mine and then just ramble a bit, I think.

    You should totes watch the Nicole Kidman movie. I actually j'adore that film. Bette Midler is even funnier as Bobbie (y? ie? Can't remember), and it has some freakier moments in the MA, and everything's candy floss coloured and the men's thing is sort of explained better. ALTHOUGH, as the intro in the book points out, it does twist everything around to make an older woman the ultimate bad guy. Still awesome, though, and funnier than the book!

    ReplyDelete